Tuesday, January 20, 2015

What about legalistic fooforaw?

The NYT today quotes from Antonin Scalia's dissent in U.S. v. Windsor:
The “legalistic argle-bargle” in Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion, Justice Scalia wrote, suggested that it was only a matter of time until the court established a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
"Argle-bargle"?



Did the Justice make a Simpson's reference in his 2013 dissent? (Apparently, I'm not the first one to ask that question)